Does carbon dating work dinosaurs journal entry to record liquidating dividend
Theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss told RSR's Bob Enyart (rsr.org/krauss) that 14c in allegedly million-year-old specimens is an "anomaly." However, an anomaly is something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.
Because radiocarbon exists in significant quantities, far above the least count (margin of error) with our state-of-the-art AMS labs doing the tests, these results can !
Scientists who are Christians who adhere to a six-day creation would recognize that it’s expected that there would be some carbon-14 in the bones because not enough time has passed for all of it to decay (since the age of the earth is less than 2 half-lives of carbon-14).
But since the age predicted by the method is wrong (i.e.
And consider this from a peer-reviewed paper in a respected scientific journal, "at a constant 10°C (the approximate mean annual air temperature in Britain today) it will take between 0.2 and 0.7 Ma for levels of collagen to fall to 1% of their original concentration in an optimal burial environment." * Getting Graded: An expert on radiocarbon dating, long-time assistant professor at Loma Linda University, Dr. The teacher corrected a couple points and clarified a few others.
Paul Giem himself, graded the information presented below. He gave the original text (available here) a grade of A minus.
However, scientists are consistently finding 14c everywhere it shouldn't be.
Note that the results don’t really tell us anything except that there is some quantity of carbon-14 in the bones.
The Radiocarbon field itself now widely acknowledges, and tries almost desperately to discount, that specimens supposedly millions and billions of years old will yield maximum carbon-14 ages of only thousands of years!
* Carbon 14 in Dinosaurs at Singapore's American Geophysical Conference: On how to date a dinosaur, Real Science Radio's Bob Enyart interviews Hugh Miller, a member of the international scientific team that presented at the 2012 AGU geophysical conference in Singapore, the carbon dating results from five respected laboratories around the world of bones from ten dinosaurs (from the Gobi Desert in China, from Europe, Alaska, Texas, and Montana). Yet each of these dinosaurs had plenty of radiocarbon (as expected in that virtually every relevant peer-reviewed paper on the topic confirms the presence of endogenous soft tissue in fossils; see Dinosaur Soft Tissue.com).
Evolutionists “know” the dates are wrong because they believe the earth is much, much older than what God tells us it is. “Carbon dating dinosaur bones is ludicrous, and the fact they yielded numbers is meaningless.” Another remark noted in the article was “. An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory. Another common “explanation” — other than contamination — though it’s really just a theory, is that the carbon-14 that exists in the bones was produced by millions of years of uranium and thorium decaying underground and injecting the bones with carbon-14 isotopes produced during the decay process.
* Carbon-14 is Everywhere so it Can't Be an Anomaly: Carbon-14 doesn't lie. And it's so unstable that all 14c atoms in a sample would radioactively decay in far less than a million years.